PROPOSITIONAL MODERNITY
- Entry for 09 March 2007
-
“Life is never too pronounced, until the mind is allowed to develop”.
Hello People:
I base this phrase, written by myself; on the idea and moral principle stating: All human beings require the growth of their sensibilities to assist in the construction of the “Self Concept” and Personality. This could be viewed as ” An assimilation of a kind”, responsible for obviously; our representation in the world.
Positive and Existential philosophies often point to the position stressing resurgent leaps of faith and hope; soundly prompting discussion over “Rediscovering the meaning of things“. This is especially true in coming to some acknowledgement about the various influences and good karma so pursued with vigour by people at this contemporary stage of living.
What I have found most interesting through studying the sociological patterns of a Secular and Liberal Democratic society; albeit whether that is from an American or British perspective; Religion tends to gain more prominence socially.
Seeing the frequent amiable Evangilist on the city streets becomes something of a feature to the usual afternoon in and around the city centre, purporting as you do hear of the Christian position on so many current issues.
But despite presenting this drive towards having people reflect upon faith matters, which includes the odd comforting parable read to you in order to reinforce some evident message; the standing of Positive Law within a Liberal Democratically structured society seems to be constantly undermined and challenged from many legally-placed angles.
This I find to be very telling as; the thinking behind all this suggests to me; that the strength and role morality within this whole morass is expected to adhere contentfully inside the archetypal religious model, which assists in structuring a systematic and contemplative mode of reasoning to be transferred in confidence to an individual.
I feel strongly about the apparent depreciation; and the type of conditions within operation; so allowing the mechanisms of English/UK Positive Law to be steadily eroded, while the Religious sectors of society, inside of a Liberal Democratic Establishment such as is evident in the West are in the position of promoting “Morality” which expectedly seems to take the place of a Statuary Framework of Law.
Tags: | Edit Tags
Friday 9 March 2007 – 03:29PM (GMT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments
- Entry for 08 March 2007
-
Hello People:
GLOBAL CONSENSUS POLITICS
Introduction.
In this entry I would like to discuss perhaps how we “The World” might adjoin through common threads of thinking to possibly create or by chance open-up existing channels to simulating the development of a new world wide political consensus to inter-technological communication.
Vast numbers of us use the web for whatever purpose and should grab the chance to make it something political in nature. By consensus each of us, through the use of our computers, are capable without question willingly, of devising more substantially a political, agreed-upon, meaning to the Technocratic future which many citizens of the Western Hemisphere will be a part of, as a host of other features to the reworking of many social structures are introduced.
I do believe that much of the public body belonging to the world has the right to equip itself with the jurisdiction towards positively campaigning for the World Wide Web to be firmly regulated, with perhaps, degrees of content being monitored or banned, unless some form of licience is possessed by a computer-user, with home based facilities.
Information from my perspective does fall under the category of either being obtained and thus consumed for either entertainment purposes, or as a research tool, ( all be it, information with connections to something leisurely, Health, or Academic Research).
As the Internet does comprise of a open and broad availability to knowledge of all descriptions, and outer market forces confirm the operation of a social and political structure, direction and standing, to this a Knowledge Economy.
Utilising the capacity of everything this is will appreciatively place some welcomed distance between times lived in the 20th century, concerning itself with notions of Empirialism; to this more Progressive of eras, reorganising aspects to our lives, while providing greater fundamental control, in relation to domestic work/life balances.
The approach of such changes as we begin to reconfigure society on a civic basis is not something to be thought of as frightening, as it is hoped that as there are greater recognitions and liberal allowances granted, the identity of a Technocratic Society will inherit the mantal towards being past expressing a Primordial outlook, and whereas, Freedom will mean Freedom.
Thank you
John.
Tags: | Edit Tags
Thursday 8 March 2007 – 03:13PM (GMT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments
- Entry for 03 March 2007
-
Hello People: How are you?
Introduction:
Ref: Extrapolating understandings between the contextual Pedagogy found through the Political Purposes of Atheism, comparative to the methods incorporated within the spheres of; and in respect to; the religious teaching of principles, beliefs and ideas; as sanctioned through Monotheism.
Introduction:
*Although not holding to any prescriptive and exact faith myself, but personally maintaining both a mindful and spiritual awareness for a definite need and place in the modern world for a Moral Premise; I have also had a very deep interest in the working mechanisms of Religion and otherwise the position of Theocratic Politics from a Global Perspective.
*Similar to the title of this essay above, the premise of my original thoughts about this occurred to me through simply deciphering what particular importance is given to the notion of Divinity.
*The Symbolism integrated within; whether it be; the Catholic Church, Church of England and the Synod, the Mosque and Islamic doctrine, or the Synagogue all place emphasis on existence and unfolding historical perspective of a single and higher archetype entity; for which both meanings in various forms, and social values are directly interwoven.
*Seemingly on ethnic grounds there do appear to be dualities between the correlations operating within the sociological features of a country’s national identity if they are theocratic, as opposed to the Western outlook towards the individual.
*Homo Sapien and hopefully law- abiding; he/she is commonly regarded as being Monotheistic by open disposition, but without presupposing the nature of any such human being, a sense of propriety and humane sentiment figures necessary, as consolidating features to the zenith degree, requiring to be recognised before expanding into ideas of Monotheism.
*Seminal to, and before particularly contemplating the supposed “Religious outlook”, what is important to mention at this juncture, concerns for all I suppose, how a religion of historical standing, practised by a people transfers successfully into the political arena.
*It we take for example the decision of a person to “convert” across to another faith: the term for this said person afterwards is known as a “Neophyte“. Now allowed to be taken as conjecture or otherwise, to my mind there are only so many transitions one could possibily make in seeking to enter into changing your personal thoughts; leading to such a commitment being made.
*Given the trans-formative nature to perhaps occur in one’s life and circumstances, by rational deduction alone:-
*It would be justifiable to add that under the simple universality of life, with civic systems attached; to continue fleeting from discovering some appeal to one belief system to perhaps being stuck in a tangent over others, would positively suggest that a person be no more stable than a drucken tramp begging on a city street somewhere around the globe; as unstable or having the potential to become unstable, possessing memories to experiences in their live’s wriggled with pitfalls.
*The “Neophyte in this regard has to become sure about the effect of the decisions they choose, understanding first and foremost the legal position to any effectual action undertaken.
*One solution I would to put forward has inter-connexions with that of marriage, if suppose a conversion was requested to be made in respect maybe to two people within a Inter-racial relationship; directly influencing the linage of any child, then the woman or man, out from which such matters apply should be required; as a facility of law; to divorce from their religion at to same point of doing so from their partner.
*Now depending on the circumstances certain clauses to this may be applicable or not; but with intergrating liciences which comply to a said person’s declaraion and request; Devised social policies towards identifing the varied pattern of this country’s demograpics (The UK) I believe would be wholly welcomed under majority opinion.
Thank You.
John.
Tags: | Edit Tags
Saturday 3 March 2007 – 03:56PM (GMT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments
- Entry for 28 February 2007
-
Hello People:
Introduction.
Aspirations towards Equality.
As much as the desire for unity between countries is kept within the sights and ambitions of most people; alike the diplomatic conditions political representatives suitably juxtapose or uni-laterally co-ordinate; the issue or more precisely the ratio, evidencing the balances of existing Civil Equalities to the degree of Domestic/National cohesion within Britain, has also almost, to entirety, produced a cross-sectional effect, biting away at society.
The endearing class-structure firmly correlated with the history of England comparatively from North to South, is without argument these days counteractive to the pressing need of Multi-Culturalism to be more securely worked upon by way of forming linkages with the various communities within this one State ( the UK).
There is now too much of a complex interwoven pattern to society’s function as something class – structured to really be concerned about now at present, and also at all points in the future.
Thanks
John
Tags: | Edit Tags
Wednesday 28 February 2007 – 11:36AM (GMT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments
- Entry for 26 February 2007
-
Hello People:
Consciousness and Subjectivity.
Introduction.
Both reputed as topics which are difficult to justly provide verification of, given the complexity of their natures, evidence of various degrees of consciousness quite obliviously exist in our natural world. But as I scribble this down, other thoughts come to mind over exactly in what context do I hope to portray the understandings I have of this human preoccupation.
As a starting point it seems appropriate to first consider through looking at the value-attachments we place on life, to perhaps ask the question: Of exactly how communicative and elaborate both the displays of Animal and Human Consciousness can be? This I put forward as an idea, referring to the fact that most Animal species, unless domesticated, inhabit environments exposed to all kinds of weather conditions, acquiring various traits via reproductive diversity.
A great many variety of creatures do possess the capability of establishing social bonds, innately through the mother/infant symbiotic dynamic. Elephants, Lions, Tigers, Cats and Dogs in the initial period after giving birth nurture their young as mammalian behaviour is known.
Instinct therefore I believe is not responsible for the type of distinct subjectivity aimed at being examined specifically here, but rather the matter of possessing a shared connection between being able to identify signs of life before direct consciousness more generally, demonstrates an immediate attendant response proved to be truely automatic along complete chains of species.
From the perspective of the development of humanity, the issue of how personal subjectivity is acquired, is I believe designated, through the operating of linguistic mechanisms.
Tags: | Edit Tags
Monday 26 February 2007 – 01:44PM (GMT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments
Add John O’s Blog to your My Yahoo! page:
leave a comment